Boating with a youngster

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • soozand3g
    • Oct 2008
    • 45



    #31
    truly. a good lifejacket is where it's at. without one that is comfortable, your trip out will be miserable for everyone! but if you get you child used to it and NEVER let them even step foot on that boat without it, it will be just like puttin' on shoes.
    i have to say, being out on the lake with my family truly is priceless. i cannot imagine what we would do without a boat! (although we are currently boatless, haha,but are hoping to have one in the next couple of weeks) the memories that we are making out there every weekend... priceless.
    good luck!

    Comment

    • AuMDLST
      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
      • Apr 2007
      • 870

      • Orlando, FL (Butler Chain)


      #32
      jackkrash -
      We have had our boy out since he was <5months. I can't say enough good things about this infant vest:

      http://www.mountainbaby.com/item.php/Salus_Bijoux.html

      He would not wear anything else without pitching a fit. Also, he could wear this in his carseat without being strapped in. He just turned 18 months and we are dryland training him on a ski skimmer for this summer.
      Correct me if I am wrong but it does not appear that this device carries approval from the US Coastguard - Not a cheap ticket to get in Florida from the Sheriff.
      2006 SANTE 210 (Pending Sale)
      2005 206 TE (Previous)
      1994 SNOB (First Nautique/Boat)

      Comment

      • jjackkrash
        Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
        • May 2007
        • 498

        • PacNW

        • 2021 Ski

        #33
        Originally posted by AuMDLST
        jackkrash -
        We have had our boy out since he was <5months. I can't say enough good things about this infant vest:

        http://www.mountainbaby.com/item.php/Salus_Bijoux.html

        He would not wear anything else without pitching a fit. Also, he could wear this in his carseat without being strapped in. He just turned 18 months and we are dryland training him on a ski skimmer for this summer.
        Correct me if I am wrong but it does not appear that this device carries approval from the US Coastguard - Not a cheap ticket to get in Florida from the Sheriff.
        I believe that you are correct. Its a Canadian product. But it works and is safe.

        http://www.salusmarine.com/transport_canada.html


        [/i]

        Comment

        • AuMDLST
          Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
          • Apr 2007
          • 870

          • Orlando, FL (Butler Chain)


          #34
          We get stopped several times a season - just for random checks - and if that was the only vest onboard/on an individual you would get a ticket. Same goes for checks at the ramps where they wont let you launch unless all vests are USCG approved (one for each onboard). Looks like a good product for when not underway.
          2006 SANTE 210 (Pending Sale)
          2005 206 TE (Previous)
          1994 SNOB (First Nautique/Boat)

          Comment

          • jjackkrash
            Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
            • May 2007
            • 498

            • PacNW

            • 2021 Ski

            #35
            Originally posted by AuMDLST
            We get stopped several times a season - just for random checks - and if that was the only vest onboard/on an individual you would get a ticket. Same goes for checks at the ramps where they wont let you launch unless all vests are USCG approved (one for each onboard). Looks like a good product for when not underway.
            We typically ski at a private lake, so not an issue, but we have passed two inspections where we were boarded on a public lake in Texas. Sounds like you have some real sticklers. [/b]

            Comment

            • AirTool
              1,000 Post Club Member
              • Sep 2007
              • 4049

              • Katy, Texas


              #36
              Originally posted by jjackkrash
              We typically ski at a private lake, so not an issue, but we have passed two inspections where we were boarded on a public lake in Texas. Sounds like you have some real sticklers.
              You were lucky. I would expect a TPWD ranger to check that if the pfd's looked even the least bit non-Academy or non-Walmart.

              OFF TOPIC: They know all the tricks. I've had to show them the dial on the fire extinguiser, blow the whistle or honk the horn. One almost boarded because he couldn't hear my internal blower. Lastly, they always ask for the registration card which most people forget. I have mine zip-tied in a waterproof zip pouch so it is always in there.

              I was surprised the last time I was stopped, that they didn't ask me for any identification to check against the registration. I guess they don't really care who I am or whose boat it is as long as no laws are broken.

              I'm a fan of all of it, though....just please don't stop me until my rider falls or my fish is boarded.

              Comment

              • TRO
                Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                • Mar 2009
                • 410

                • Houston, TX


                #37
                seems like i'd be more worried about my child's safety with a non-coastguard approved vest than i would be about the ticket i might get.

                Comment

                • AirTool
                  1,000 Post Club Member
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 4049

                  • Katy, Texas


                  #38
                  Originally posted by TRO
                  seems like i'd be more worried about my child's safety with a non-coastguard approved vest than i would be about the ticket i might get.
                  Can you elaborate on this? ...are you saying that because a PFD isn't USCG "approved" that it is inadequate?

                  I think your taking some of the posts above out of context. I'll elaborate more after I see your answer.

                  Comment

                  • TRO
                    Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 410

                    • Houston, TX


                    #39
                    EDIT*

                    i did not intend to respond to any particular post so i do not believe i could have taken some of the posts above out of context.

                    i would imagine there are probably areas of functionality that are lacking on NON-USCG approved vests that are available on USCG approved vests. i don't think those approvals are based on aesthetic issues. however, it might just be an issue of the manufacturer not wanting to spend the money and time to get a vest USCG approved. i'm not really sure of the process.

                    inadequate? that's probably a personal decision based on an individual's situation. i doubt anyone could tell you or me what is "inadequate" for each of our particular situations.

                    Comment

                    • Nautiqueman
                      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 487

                      • Birmingham, AL

                      • 1985 Southwind 20 1987 Ski Nautique - New 1989 Ski Nautique - New 1992 Ski Nautique 1997 Ski Nautique 1998 Ski Nautique - New 1989 Martinique 1999 Sport Nautique 1999 Air Nautique 1988 Ski Nautique 1998 Sport 2004 SV-211 - New 2005 SV-211 1993 Ski Nautique 2002 Ski Nautique - New yellow black 2002 Ski Nautique orange black 2002 Ski Nautique blue black 1999 Super Sport Masters blue 2006 220 TE - new Lime Green 1997 Ski Nautique red black 2000 Ski Nautique Masters - Navy

                      #40
                      I have had my kids out (the girls are 8 years apart in age) and can remember when I would put the younger one down on a towel by my feet in a Ski Nautique so she could nap while I was pulling the older kids. Always had a life jacket even while napping and I was not really pulling the older ones aggressively.

                      Comment

                      • prairiethunder
                        • May 2009
                        • 84



                        #41
                        My wife and I had our first baby in december with lot's and neices and nephews around we new our baby girl would be in the boat before she is 6 months old. When my wife put it on our doughter to see how they fit she said our little girl had a big smile fully straped in! From my experience this is un heard of for a youngster to not break into tears the second they have the life jacket pulled over their head (and subsequently preventing all neck movement). I'm already impressed. Below is a link to a letter from transport canada regarding the life jacket. In cananda there are no approved lifejackets for babies under 25lbs..... and threre for no requirements to have an approved life jacket on board for infants..... as the letter states...... "having the infant in a comfortable and effective pfd is the logical and appropriate descision." Not sure if the U.S. coast guard has similar views or reg's regarding pfd's in the under 25lb. category. We will be on the water this weekend demoing our (hopefully) 1st new to us '97 SN 196.

                        link to Transport Can. letter

                        http://www.salusmarine.com/transport_canada.html
                        It\'s Good to be Here
                        \'97 SN

                        Comment

                        • Christopher-W.-Becker
                          • Dec 2003
                          • 168

                          • Ann Arbor, MI


                          #42
                          All,

                          IF YOU ARE IN MICHIGAN....the law requires all children under 6 years of age to wear a USCG—approved Type I or II PFD when riding on the open deck of any vessel. NOTE: Type IIIs are a No No. So no neoprenes. If it does NOT have the big float block in the flap in the back for the head OR if it is has floatation material in the back it will result in a $100 ticket.
                          Christopher W. Becker
                          9323 Mockingbird Ln
                          Saline, MI 48176

                          cwbecker@umich.edu

                          Comment

                          • AuMDLST
                            Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 870

                            • Orlando, FL (Butler Chain)


                            #43
                            The hyperlite Infant Indy vest is USCG approved and neoprene.
                            2006 SANTE 210 (Pending Sale)
                            2005 206 TE (Previous)
                            1994 SNOB (First Nautique/Boat)

                            Comment

                            • BP22
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 248

                              • Covina, CA

                              • 2006 Super Air Nautique 210

                              #44
                              We have been using the Salus Bijoux vest on our son since he was 4 months old, he is now 1. It fits him well and is very adjustable.
                              Attached Files
                              Brandon
                              2006 SAN 210

                              Comment

                              • Rock_Toy
                                • Jun 2004
                                • 146



                                #45
                                I would highly recommend suntan lotion, a hat, glasses, rubber ducky and some sort of "flotation devices" nearby.
                                Attached Files
                                Player\'s Edition SSN. Pimpin\' the rest....

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X