Acme 856 or 644 for 03 SAN?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ViSoR
    • Sep 2010
    • 266

    • Montreal, Quebec, Canada


    #16
    Originally posted by obd666 View Post
    is funny that after the many different threads about the 1464 vs. the 1236, all we really know is that the 1236 is "a little less aggressive" than the 1464.
    hahaha so true! I don't understand everything surrounding props yet (pitch, cup) but people seem to be very pleased with both so I just chose one! lol

    Originally posted by obd666 View Post
    went in for a 1236, am lookin forward to a helluva lot more "grab"
    Considering my boat apparently had the 380 (it's a Limited, not a Team) I should be flying out the water when I'm loaded with surf ballast this summer!!
    2008 SANTE 230
    2005 SAN 210 - Sold

    Comment

    • obd666
      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
      • Feb 2010
      • 793

      • Bostian Heights, NC

      • 03 SANTE

      #17
      Originally posted by ViSoR View Post
      Considering my boat apparently had the 380 (it's a Limited, not a Team) I should be flying out the water when I'm loaded with surf ballast this summer!!
      yeah, that will be a drastic difference. will have to learn to drive that thing all over again with all that new grab

      a 380? wow, ive never even heard about that prop. will have to look it up
      Last edited by obd666; 04-23-2012, 08:39 AM.
      2003 SANTE - "OG 210"

      Comment

      • obd666
        Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
        • Feb 2010
        • 793

        • Bostian Heights, NC

        • 03 SANTE

        #18
        Originally posted by obd666 View Post
        a 380? wow, ive never even heard about that prop. will have to look it up
        ouch, 17 pitch !! you did need a reprop ...
        2003 SANTE - "OG 210"

        Comment

        • thedude
          Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
          • Apr 2007
          • 451

          • SW PA


          #19
          the 1464 is a great prop. I now run about 2800 lbs ballast and the boat rips out of the hole and gets on plane faster than stock ballast with the 816 prop. Best $$ i've ever spent on the boat. Won't get you much more than 38-39 mph though unloaded.

          Comment

          • ViSoR
            • Sep 2010
            • 266

            • Montreal, Quebec, Canada


            #20
            Originally posted by obd666 View Post
            ouch, 17 pitch !! you did need a reprop ...
            I didn't think of checking the prop the first summer I had it, nor did I know about props! lol This is my first boat.
            Can't wait to try it in 2 weeks
            2008 SANTE 230
            2005 SAN 210 - Sold

            Comment

            • TRDon
              Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
              • Oct 2007
              • 722

              • MN

              • 1985 2001 1993 Sport carb GT40 2003 SANTE Excalibur

              #21
              Got it opened up, kinda. I didn't run it over 5k for more than 5 seconds, but even so, 40 was about it. Bummer, but whatever, not horrible considering it was made for a purpose and 98% of the time, it will be utilized adequately.

              Comment

              • d_rock
                • Apr 2005
                • 22



                #22
                Thanks for the update. I was out yesterday and I got up to 43 at about 4500. I didnt like winding it out that much, so I guess Im just going to lose a little but have more fun getting there. I remember how cool it was to go from the 536 to the 644 so I bet it will be even better with the 1236. thanks for everyones input!

                Comment

                • Bimmerboyz
                  Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 378

                  • Herriman UT

                  • 1978 Ski Nautique that I miss:-( 2003 SANTE

                  #23
                  What would be the recommendation if I have a 03 210 team , I use it for everything. Wakeboard/Slalom/Surf in that order. I Slalom at 35mph, surf with stock ballast and a few people. I turn 2700 RPM's while surfing at 10.5mph. I don't see myself adding anything more than 1klbs of ballast to the stock ballast.

                  I don't want to be turning high RPM's while slaloming.

                  So 644,856 or 1236.

                  Comment

                  • gride
                    1,000 Post Club Member
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 1453

                    • War Eagle

                    • 05' 210 team

                    #24
                    I'd go with 644 ifnu slalom. At 35 mph with a 250lb rider on a fast ski my friend ran 4000k rpms with a 644.

                    Comment

                    • Bimmerboyz
                      Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 378

                      • Herriman UT

                      • 1978 Ski Nautique that I miss:-( 2003 SANTE

                      #25
                      Originally posted by gride View Post
                      I'd go with 644 ifnu slalom. At 35 mph with a 250lb rider on a fast ski my friend ran 4000k rpms with a 644.
                      I think with the 536, I turn close to 4k at 35mph.

                      Comment

                      • obd666
                        Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                        • Feb 2010
                        • 793

                        • Bostian Heights, NC

                        • 03 SANTE

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Bimmerboyz View Post
                        So 644,856 or 1236.
                        definitely cant go 1236, will have you turning too much rev for slalom
                        2003 SANTE - "OG 210"

                        Comment

                        • Mikeski
                          1,000 Post Club Member
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 2908

                          • San Francisco, CA

                          • Current 2005 SV 211, due for upgrade! GS22 or GS24 perhaps? Previous

                          #27
                          If you have a GT-40 I would recommend the 536, if you have the Excal 330 I would recommend the 644. I ran a 1234 on my SV211 (won't fit your boat), I didn't think it ran too high of rpms for slalom with my Excal 330 (about 4200 rpms) but the larger diameter prop threw propwash like a jetboat. Ping pong sized pellets of water below was not a fun experience so it was removed after one slalom run. I am currently running a 644 and keep the 856 as my high load/high altitude/spare prop.

                          Comment

                          • Bimmerboyz
                            Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 378

                            • Herriman UT

                            • 1978 Ski Nautique that I miss:-( 2003 SANTE

                            #28
                            I have an 03, so EX330. I am rarely below 5kft elevation. I can't decide 856 or 644. Maybe I'll order both and compare them on the same day.

                            Comment

                            • Bimmerboyz
                              Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 378

                              • Herriman UT

                              • 1978 Ski Nautique that I miss:-( 2003 SANTE

                              #29
                              Any more input on this? I still have the 536 but wanting to change for this season.

                              Comment

                              • Bimmerboyz
                                Senior Member of PLANETNAUTIQUE
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 378

                                • Herriman UT

                                • 1978 Ski Nautique that I miss:-( 2003 SANTE

                                #30
                                Anyone tried the 1248?

                                Comment

                                Working...